Could you deal with unlimited wealth?

You’ve just been granted access to all the world’s currency to spend as you see fit. Even the money that is currently in people’s pockets (though they don’t know it and still can spend it as per usual). Any new currency that came into existence later would be yours as well. Would you be able to spend it wisely, making wise decisions to further mankind or would you squander it on useless things?

24 responses to “Could you deal with unlimited wealth?”

  1. Yin says:

    Video games are the first personal thing that come to mind. I wouldn’t buy everything, but I’d be a bit more free at buying them and the DLC for them. Other than that and using it for things for me live, home/food, I’d be giving with it. With unlimited money, I have to acknowledge that I could tank the economy or inflate the dollar if I just helped every cause with millions/billions, but I’d totally be giving it out to groups or individuals who needed help. I’d also help Elon Musk and others with funding clean energy along with other scientific research.

    Reply

    Loading spinner
  2. Money is not wealth.

    When are you going to escape that hamster wheel Jear77?

    Reply

    Loading spinner
  3. Well you said so right there: I’d be spending other people’s money. Therefore I would spend NONE of it. If I were to walk through a valley of gold, and it belonged to other people, I would touch none of it, not even a grain. Because I’m not a thief, and it wouldn’t be right.

    I like to be free from money. I feel more alive when I’m struggling to survive rather than when I’m just given a bunch of money to live off of. “easier” lives are not better quality. They turn you into a prick.

    Reply

    Loading spinner
    • Jear77 says:

      @georockstar09 Not necessarily. Without money I can’t buy my loved ones help – help that I either cannot or will not provide myself.

      Reply

      Loading spinner
      • @Jear77 What about other people’s loved ones, and other people’s families? I’m still not going to take away from them just to benefit myself and my own family. And wealth has had a tendency to distance people who love each other. It’s good to have enough to take care of yourself and your family, but you don’t need to have unbound riches just to help them. They, too, should be able to take care of themselves to some extent. They deserve that dignity. Otherwise they would feel useless and patronized.

        Reply

        Loading spinner
      • griz says:

        @Jear77
        But if you do this at the expense of others’ ability to care for their loved ones?
        (Back to the scenario of you owning all the currency for yourself).

        Reply

        Loading spinner
      • Jear77 says:

        @griz Let’s say that it is like the paradox of schrodinger’s cat? (Both alive and dead at the same time). It’s both mine (or whoever’s) and theirs at the same time?

        Reply

        Loading spinner
      • griz says:

        @Jear77
        I would point out that the whole hypothetical construct of superposition breaks down the nano-second it is interacted with (even observed) by the external world. (At which point all possibilities collapse into one or another of the possible definite states or conditions).

        It’s ultimately a construct . . . that one cannot even dare to look at lest superposition collapses!

        But interestingly, Schrodinger himself postulated how one could, in principle, create a superposition in a large-scale system by making it dependent on a quantum particle that was in a superposition.

        What if God functioned as what our fledgling intellect in this example called a “quantum particle” in superposition? Meaning that all who are dependent upon it . . . can “retain superposition” . . . .

        . . . being both of flesh that is dying, and of the Eternal Spirit of Life?

        (So is this worthy of a block-threat??)

        Reply

        Loading spinner
  4. I think if I had unlimited wealth, money itself would take on a much different meaning. If I had unlimited amounts of something that you needed, what kind of monster would I be to withhold it from you. And, if I’m giving to the needy, how do I discern between the deserving and the undeserving? Having unlimited cash doesn’t make one a god, right? So, I’d defer on the safe side and assume if they ask, they must need so I’d give. Unfortunately, giving all that money away would lead to a massive devaluation of what I’m giving away. Money isn’t rare or hard to come by anymore so it becomes far less important. My unlimited wads of cash become a worthless burden to carry around. Perhaps I would start to realize that I still need the same things I needed before unlimited cash came into my life. The world transitions to a sharing economy and humanity flourishes as we go skipping into the sunset hand in hand…

    Reply

    Loading spinner
    • griz says:

      @TruthDistillery
      Something I experienced in my own life process was that FIRST I altered my meaning, take, and reaction to money . . . and only then did the amount of money in my life increase drastically.

      When you don’t have it, there is a tendency to play it up as a kind of messiah that will “solve everything”. People who have “too much” of it, tend to live in the same mind-set, though some on a very subconscious level.

      My observation is that both ends of the spectrum run so easily into a kind of folly that is remedied only by STARTING with a healthy relationship with money.

      There’s shades of this in the Biblical story of the poor widow who put “only” two small coins into the temple collection box and was recognized as having given more than anyone else who dropped huge sums into it.

      Reply

      Loading spinner

Leave a Reply

I am an avid writer (mainly RPG stuff), and love to cook.

More Conversations

Search the Site